HomeProfessional ProfilesPractice AreasFirm NewsLegal AlertsResources

 

 

FCC Extends Disability Rules to VoIP and Proposes New E911 Standards

 

In its Report and Order (“Order”), released June 15, 2007 (adopted May 31, 2007), the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) extended the disability access requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) providers and equipment manufacturers.  On May 31, 2007, the FCC also released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“Notice”) advancing various proposals involving Enhanced 911 (“E911”) location accuracy standards, including a tentative conclusion to apply the accuracy standards for commercial mobile radio services (“CMRS”) to certain interconnected VoIP services that can be used in more than one location.  In addition to interconnected VoIP providers, the proposals in the Notice also stand to impact wireless or CMRS providers.

 

The FCC’s Notice and Order illustrate an ongoing trend by the agency to further regulate VoIP offerings.  In the last few years, the FCC has already extended various regulatory requirements to VoIP providers.  Previous FCC decisions have required VoIP providers to comply with Universal Service Fund (“USF”) contribution requirements, Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (“CALEA”) requirements, and E911 requirements.

 

Disability Access and VoIP

 

Section 255 Requirements

 

The most recent version of Section 255 of the Communications Act was adopted in 1999 to help ensure that both telecommunications equipment and services would be developed to be accessible to individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable.  Since then, VoIP services have evolved and proliferated to a point where the FCC has taken special note of the increasing use of VoIP services as a substitute for traditional landline telephones.  Consequently, the FCC commenced a rulemaking proceeding, on March 10, 2004, to determine whether or not Section 255 applies to interconnected VoIP providers.

 

The FCC’s June 15, 2007 Order officially concludes that interconnected VoIP service providers (which allow users to receive calls from and terminate calls to the Public Switched Telephone Network) are now required to comply with the disability access obligations in Section 255 of the Communications Act.  The Order further applies Section 255 obligations to manufacturers of equipment or Customer Premises Equipment (“CPE”) designed to provide interconnected VoIP services or needed to effectively use VoIP services.

 

Specifically, the new rules require that a service provider must ensure its service is accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable.  Manufacturers must ensure that equipment is designed, developed, and fabricated so that any portion is accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable.  If either is not readily achievable, providers and manufacturers are required to make certain that services and equipment will be compatible with existing devices or equipment currently used by individuals with disabilities to achieve access. 

 

Both service providers as well as VoIP equipment and CPE manufacturers are required to make accessible the information and documentation provided in connection with their service or equipment.  Furthermore, providers and manufacturers are also required to: (1) consider accessibility throughout the design, development and fabrication process of services and equipment; (2) consider accessibility issues in the development of training for employees; and (3) maintain records of their compliance efforts that can be presented to the FCC in the event of consumer complaints.

 

Finally, the Order also requires all Section 255 covered providers and manufacturers to designate a company contact person/agent to handle accessibility complaints and inquiries.  Contact information for a designated agent (including name, company name, address, email, phone and fax numbers, and whether the company is a manufacturer or provider) must be emailed to SECTION255_POC@fcc.gov within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the new rules.

 

Section 225 (TRS) Requirements

 

As part of the proceeding to evaluate Section 255 obligations, the FCC also attempted to determine what changes needed to be made to the Interstate Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) Fund.  These services allow individuals with hearing or speech disabilities to make and receive telephone calls with the assistance of an operator.  Accessing TRS can be accomplished by dialing the 711 access number.  TRS, which is governed by Section 225 of the Communications Act, is funded by contributions from all carriers providing interstate services based on revenue information reported on the FCC Form 499-A.

 

The June 15, 2007 Order also extends the requirements of Section 225 to interconnected VoIP service providers.  Thus, interconnected VoIP providers will be required to make contributions to the Interstate TRS Fund beginning on the effective date of the rule revisions.  For the 2007-2008 TRS Fund Year, interconnected VoIP providers will be assessed contributions (based on 2007 revenues) on a pro-rated basis.  Section 225 also requires that interconnected VoIP providers implement 711 abbreviated dialing access to TRS.  Providers are allowed to implement 711 access using the most economical and efficient means they choose.  Finally, interconnected VoIP providers are required to conduct ongoing education and outreach programs to publicize the availability of 711 access to the largest number of consumers possible.

 

Proposed E911 Standards for VoIP

 

The FCC’s Notice, released on May 31, 2007, contained a range of proposals for changes to current E911 standards and regulations.  The Notice requests public comment on proposals to clarify the geographic scope of accuracy reporting, implement new technologies, and require mandatory schedules and methods for compliance testing, among other things (see list below).  Furthermore, the Notice seeks to address several proposed changes to the accuracy standards and requirements for E911 services, including applying the accuracy standards of circuit-switched CMRS to interconnected VoIP services that may be used in more than one location.

 

There are currently different accuracy standards for network-based and handset-based technologies.  Network-based technologies (using a form of triangulation) are required to report latitude and longitude information within accuracy of 100 meters for 67 percent of calls and 300 meters for 95 percent of calls.  Handset-based technologies (handset based GPS) have requirements of 50 meters for 67 percent of calls and 150 meters for 95 percent of calls.  The FCC’s Notice tentatively concludes that, instead of the bi-furcated standards, a single, technology neutral, location accuracy requirement will be adopted.  Moreover, due to advances in location technology, the FCC proposes to make location accuracy standards even more stringent than required by either of the current standards.

 

The FCC’s Notice also tentatively concludes that certain interconnected VoIP services must utilize automatic location technology meeting the same accuracy standards that apply to services provided by circuit-switched CMRS.  This would only apply to interconnected VoIP services that can be accessed in more than one location, as opposed to purely “fixed” VoIP services.  For example, “portable” VoIP services, which may utilize handsets that can be used from any location with a broadband connection, would be subject to the same accuracy standards as either the network- or handset-based technologies described above.  Furthermore, these interconnected VoIP services would be required to comply with the more stringent accuracy standards if and when they are introduced.

 

Unless otherwise noted, public comments for proposals and issues addressed in the Notice are due August 20, 2007, and reply comments are due September 18, 2007.  Filings related to this Notice should refer to PS Docket No. 07-114 and WC Docket No. 05-196. 

 

Other E911 Issues Addressed in the Notice

  • The FCC seeks to address ambiguities about the geographic areas that service providers use to test and measure accuracy and compliance levels for E911 service required under Section 20.18(h) of the FCC’s rules (“Phase II”).  The FCC seeks public comment on a tentative rule (and when that rule should take effect) that carriers required to meet Phase II requirements need to do so at the geographic area of each local Public Safety Answering Point (“PSAP”), as opposed to averaging compliance levels over an entire state or service area.  Public comments for this proposal are due July 5, 2007, with reply comments due July 11, 2007.
  • The FCC proposes to implement a single, technology-neutral, location accuracy standard to provide uniformity in the system.  As a corollary, the FCC is considering the implementation of an even higher accuracy requirement than what Phase II already calls for.  This enhanced accuracy requirement could require other location data such as elevation information. 
  • The FCC further seeks comment on the advances in various types of location technologies, and whether or not a hybrid (handset- and network-based) or other type of technology would provide a better solution to improving location accuracy. 
  • The FCC also wishes to address concerns about the compatibility of E911 location technologies in situations involving roaming (wireless callers who are roaming on another carrier’s network may not be provided Phase II service at all because that carrier is employing both a different type of wireless technology and location technology).  The FCC seeks comment on whether a single technology could be employed across all platforms to achieve the required accuracy. 
  • The FCC would like to inquire as to what methodologies carriers should employ to test for compliance with accuracy requirements, and whether any such methodology should be adopted in the FCC’s rules.  The FCC tentatively concluded that a mandatory testing schedule would be implemented, and requests comments on what testing intervals to use and how to handle the data generated from the tests (i.e. whether or not it needs to be filed with organizations other than the PSAP). 

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you need assistance in complying with any of the new disability access rules, or if you have questions regarding the E911 Notice described above.

 

June 2007

 

Back